New Priorities Leave PE, Obese Children Behind
Students are gaining weight as schools across the country lower their physical
education standards to meet academic requirements.

From http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-physed15sep15,1,1104115.story?coll=la-headlines-nation
By Vicki Kemper
Times Staff Writer
September 15, 2003
WASHINGTON — Missing from the schedule of many students this year is one class that used
to be a given: physical education. From North Carolina to Hawaii, gym classes have been
squeezed out of the school day — a trend that parallels a national increase in childhood
obesity.
In 1991, 4 in 10 high school students took daily PE classes; 10 years later, barely a
third did. In 1980, just 5% of school-age children were severely overweight; 20 years
later, the number had jumped to 15%.
Few would argue that the one trend is completely responsible for the other, but a lack
of physical activity — in school or out — is a significant contributor to obesity.
For an increasing number of schools faced with shrinking budgets and growing demands for
improved academic performance on standardized tests — mandated by the federal No Child
Left Behind Act — physical education is a luxury they can no longer afford.
"It's a terrible, terrible decision," said Anne Bryant, executive director of the
National School Boards Assn. "Do you cut math and reading, or do you cut PE? There's a
lot more to this thing we call learning than simply test scores."
Other factors contribute to the obesity epidemic, including school lunches loaded with
fat and vending machine junk food on and off campus. But officials increasingly point to
the loss of physical education classes as one of the culprits.
Among the agencies that have begun to focus on the problem is the federal Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. Howell Wechsler, a health scientist in the CDC's
Division of Adolescent and School Health, says society should take advantage of the time
children are in school to teach them "the skills and attitudes needed to embrace a
physically active lifestyle."
The need for in-school exercise was underscored in the results of a recent national
survey by the CDC that found that almost two-thirds — 61.5% — of 9- to 13-year-olds
participate in no organized physical activities outside of school. More than a fifth —
22.6% — engage in no physical activity in their free time.
"Schools are not going to be able, on their own, to reverse this obesity epidemic,"
Wechsler acknowledged. "But they're an important part of the puzzle."
The CDC, the American Heart Assn. and the National Assn. for Sports and Physical
Education are among the many organizations that recommend daily PE from kindergarten
through 12th grade. Physical activity offers clear short- and long-term health benefits;
in addition, most health scientists believe that children who exercise regularly perform
better academically.
Illinois is the only state to mandate daily PE from kindergarten through 12th grade. And
even there, physical education classes are not a sure thing. A recent survey estimated
that fewer than 10% of the state's elementary schools complied with the law.
Some states require daily PE in elementary school, but requirements in virtually all
states decline as children age. Until recently, students in most states had to take a
year or two of PE in high school to graduate.
Minnesota recently eliminated physical education as a graduation requirement, and a new
Florida law allows high school students to graduate in three years by skipping PE and
some electives.
And roughly one-third of all high schools give students another out: If they participate
in band, cheerleading, school sports teams or similar activities, they are exempt from
physical education requirements.
In Hawaii, where 1 in every 4 children is obese and there are no minimum PE requirements
for elementary and middle schools, the state Board of Education is considering reducing
the graduation requirement from one year of high school PE to one semester.
"The curriculum is light on PE," said department spokesman Greg Knudsen, "but we do have
year-round accessibility to outdoor sports."
Even California's relatively tough requirements — elementary schools must offer an
average of 20 minutes of PE per day; middle and high schools must offer an average of 40
minutes per day; and high school students must take PE for two years to graduate — have
produced disappointing results.
Only 24% of the state's fifth-, seventh- and ninth-graders met minimal physical fitness
standards last year.
Dianne Wilson-Graham, who directs physical education in California, noted that the state
does not enforce its requirements. "There are a lot of demands on teachers," she said.
In North Carolina, James F. Causby, superintendent of Johnston County schools, sees
overweight students and knows that additional PE classes would promote fitness, new
skills and, very likely, better learning.
"We do not provide as much physical education as we would like to," Causby said. "We
don't give it to elementary school students every day, and some middle school students
don't get it at all." To graduate, high school students need one year of PE.
Yet when the state Legislature considered a bill this year that would have mandated a
minimum weekly PE requirement, Causby — along with the state school boards association
and the North Carolina Assn. of Educators — opposed it.
Daily PE in elementary schools would require the hiring of more specially trained
teachers, leaving the schools with fewer classroom teachers and larger classes, Causby
said. "And that would be negative on student [academic] achievement."
Offering daily PE in a middle school in his district, he said, would require adding five
PE teachers at a cost of roughly $200,000 a year — or cutting electives like band, drama
and choir.
Other options include lengthening the school day or taking time away from academics, but
"no one wants to do" either of those, Causby said.
Ultimately, Causby found himself asking: Is promoting physical activity the school
system's responsibility? He decided that childhood obesity is a societal — not
educational — issue.
It is an argument many strapped school systems are falling back on as they cut physical
education classes.
Despite a rash of cuts in physical education programs, some states and schools are
bucking the trend.
Federal officials and PE experts cite an innovative skills-based program in Michigan and
South Carolina's recent decision to grade schools on PE as well as academics. The Texas
school board, which phased out elementary school PE in 1995 to allow more time for
academics, voted last year to restore the requirement. A number of schools have added
heart monitors, climbing walls and hiking trails to their PE programs.
Some schools have worked to integrate physical education with academic subjects. If PE
students are learning about their target heart rate, for example, classroom teachers can
use math to teach them how to calculate it, science to explain how the heart functions
and health education to convey the role diet plays in a healthy heart.
The CDC has sponsored an advertising campaign encouraging adolescents to be active, and
the Department of Health and Human Services will soon award about $15 million in grants
to schools and community organizations for programs promoting physical activity.
Among proponents of physical education is Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), a lifetime
physical fitness buff who three years ago sponsored legislation creating the Carol M.
White Physical Education for Progress program. Administered by the Department of
Education, the program has or will soon award $115 million in grants to help schools buy
PE equipment, hire and train instructors and renovate gyms and other facilities.
In North Carolina, where legislation mandating a specific daily PE requirement has been
put on hold, educators are starting to carry out a state education board policy that
gives local advisory councils a say in shaping school PE programs.
For now, Causby, the superintendent from North Carolina, remains wary of anything that
would dilute his schools' academic focus — but is open to finding new ways to get kids
moving.
"Maybe we should do calisthenics every morning for 20 minutes," he said. "I would not be
opposed to doing something like that."

|
Copyright 2003 Los Angeles Times
|